LexNews #046 | Distrust Is the Right Default — A Young Lawyer's Ethics Guide to AI in Legal Practice

📰 LexNews #046 — SavvyLex Legal AI Intelligence | April 20, 2026

Source: Sean N. Doyle, Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney | Law.com | April 16, 2026

――――――――――――――――――――

The Take

A young associate just published the most honest take on AI in legal practice we've read all year. His thesis: distrust is the secret ingredient. Not cynicism — productive, professional skepticism. The kind that keeps AI hallucinations out of court filings and bar complaints off your record.

Sean N. Doyle of Segal McCambridge writes in Law.com: "The only thing preventing an AI hallucination from ending up in a court filing… is a skeptical attorney checking its citations for accuracy."

――――――――――――――――――――

The Real Risk: Subtle Distortions, Not Just Hallucinations

Doyle found it the hard way. He used AI to summarize depositions — and it repeatedly interpreted 'I'm not sure' as 'no.' Not a dramatic hallucination. A quiet distortion. The kind that changes the record without anyone noticing.

This is why ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 2024) puts full ethical responsibility on the attorney — not the tool. Your bar license doesn't transfer to the AI.

――――――――――――――――――――

The Framework: Treat AI Like a First-Year Clerk

Doyle's practical framework is simple and battle-tested:

• Treat every AI output like work from a first-year clerk — review it, don't rubber-stamp it

• Check every citation — does it exist? Does it actually say what the AI claims?

• Verify quoted language word for word before it goes into any filing

• Never let unreviewed AI output reach a client or court

• Log your verification steps — the audit trail matters when questions arise

――――――――――――――――――――

What ABA Formal Opinion 512 Actually Says

Issued July 29, 2024, ABA Formal Opinion 512 provides the ethics-focused framework for using generative AI tools in legal practice. Its core guidance: attorneys must understand the AI tools they use, supervise their outputs, and take full responsibility for any work product — AI-assisted or not.

――――――――――――――――――――

The SavvyLex Lens: Distrust by Design

At SavvyLex, this isn't advice — it's architecture. Vera enforces citation hygiene by design. Every output is traceable. Verification isn't a habit you remember to do. It's a constraint built into the workflow from the ground up.

The firms that win won't be the boldest AI users. They'll be the most disciplined verifiers. Distrust, when it's systematic and built into the workflow, stops being a burden — and becomes a competitive advantage.

📅 Ready to build verification into your legal AI workflow? Book a consultation → https://savvylex-consulting.com/BookACall

SavvyLex · Legal AI Intelligence · savvylex.com